Tradeoffs and Triangles
September 21, 2008 by Steve Meyer
Filed under Simulation
The activity of optimization involves trade off analysis. The goal is to improve performance or cost effectiveness, or both if possible. Nowadays, we have some really sophisticated software tools that allow us to simulate the behavior of complex systems. Computational fluid dynamics, magnetic field simulations, thermal imaging, finite element analysis are a few of the amazing technologies that can now be engaged on desktop computers to conduct sophisticated analysis of performance at the click of a mouse button.
Simulation work that used to require mainframe computing power is now generally available as an add on module to 3D engineering graphics products. Most of the major 3D engineering design products include animation features that allow the user to build and move the parts in space exactly as they will do when built. Read more
Mechatronic Tidal Simulation Assists Scientists
September 16, 2008 by admin
Filed under Motion Control, Simulation, Test & Measurement
Scientists from London’s Imperial College are using the new RT3 version of the Reliance Cool Muscle NEMA 23 integrated servo system to reproduce the sub-surface pressure changes created by lunar tides in laboratory research experiments directed at improving oil recovery.
The unique abilities of the RT3 version along with the support provided by Reliance allow the scientists to concentrate on the research without having to spend time controlling and verifying the test system. Read more
Better Software Tools
February 5, 2008 by admin
Filed under Automation, Motion Control, Simulation
Better Software Tools Help Machine Builders Reap the Benefits of Mechatronics.
Newer software programs intended for machine builders take advantage of mechatronic principles and easily blend the necessary and different engineering disciplines.
By John Pritchard, Global Product Marketing Manager
Kinetix Motion Control, Rockwell Automation
Traditionally, machines have been designed and built using individual mechanical, control, and electrical design teams — that work independently to produce separate pieces of the whole system. Often, the mechanical team will turn the design over to the controls team and hope they can integrate the software and controls before control and programming issues are addressed. The machine might deliver substantial performance and flexibility advantages, but typically the marriage of the mechanical functions with the control system is not optimal; it is merely sufficient. Read more
Modeling Mechatronic Systems
February 5, 2008 by admin
Filed under Simulation
Able to significantly reduce design risks, simulating overall system performance does not require expert knowledge of modeling.
By Richard Comerford, Electronic Products
The lesson of ancient Babel still resonates through the halls of design firms today: if you really want to screw up a project, make sure that everyone working on it speaks a different language. Having a common technical language to express design concepts and plans is essential to enabling a team of engineers to work together.
And before everyone goes off to work out the details of their particular part of the design, it doesn’t hurt to do an overall simulation of the design concept. This will help ensure that, when completed, a complex system can do the job for which it was intended. Read more


